AZ Smile Dental Flossers Cordless for Teeth Cleaning. Ideal To compare the shrine junking efficacity of a water flosser to string fluff combined with a homemade toothbrush after a single-use.
Styles Seventy adult subjects shared in this randomized, single- use, single-eyeless, resemblant clinical study. Subjects were assigned to one of two groups; Waterpik Water Flosser plus a homemade toothbrush (WF) or waxed string fluff plus a homemade toothbrush (SF). Each party brushed for two twinkles using the Bass fashion. The WF group added 500 ml of warm water to the force and followed the manufacturer’s instructions, and the SF group used waxed string fluff between each tooth, drawing the mesial and distal shells as instructed. Subjects were observed to insure they covered all areas and followed instructions. Scores were recorded for whole mouth, borderline, approximal, facial, and lingual regions for each subject using the Rustogi Revision of the Navy Plaque Index.
Results The WF group had a74.4 reduction in whole mouth shrine and81.6 for approximal shrine compared to57.7 and63.4 for the SF group, independently (p<0.001). The differences between the groups showed the water flosser was 29 further effective than string fluff for overall shrine junking and approximal shells specifically (p<0.001). The WF group was more effective in removing shrine from the borderline, lingual, and facial regions; 33, 39, and 24, independently (p<0.001).
Conclusion The Waterpik Water Flosser and homemade toothbrush is significantly further effective than a homemade encounter and string fluff in removing shrine from tooth shells.
Analogous papers
Comparison of two power interdental cleaning bias on shrine junking.
Sharma NC, Lyle DM, Qaqish JG, SchullerR.
J Clin Dent. 2012; 23 (1) 17-21.
PMID 22435320 Clinical Trial.
The addition of a water flosser to power tooth brushing effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and shrine.
Goyal CR, Lyle DM, Qaqish JG, SchullerR.
J Clin Dent. 2012; 23 (2) 57-63.
PMID 22779218 Clinical Trial.
Comparison of two power interdental cleaning bias on the reduction of gingivitis.
Sharma NC, Lyle DM, Qaqish JG, SchullerR.
J Clin Dent. 2012; 23 (1) 22-6.
PMID 22435321 Clinical Trial.
Shrine junking efficacity of oscillating- rotating power toothbrushes review of six relative clinical trials.
Grender J, Williams K, Walters P, Klukowska M, ReickH.
Am J Dent. 2013 Apr; 26 (2) 68-74.
PMID 24073528 Review.
Current status of indicators of shrine.
Fischman SL.
J Clin Periodontol. 1986 May; 13 (5) 371-4, 379-80. doi10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01475.x.
PMID 3013947 Review.
See all analogous papers
Cited by 2 papers
An Overview of Different Interdental Drawing Aids and Their Effectiveness.
Ng E, Lim LP.
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Jun 1; 7 (2) 56. doi10.3390/ dj7020056.
PMID 31159354 Free PMC composition. Review.
Home use of interdental cleaning bias, in addition to toothbrushing, for precluding and controlling periodontal conditions and dental caries.
Worthington HV, MacDonald L, Poklepovic Pericic T, Sambunjak D, Johnson TM, Imai P, Clarkson JE.
Cochrane Database SystRev. 2019 Apr 10; 4 (4) CD012018. doi10.1002/ 14651858.CD012018.pub2.
PMID 30968949 Free PMC composition.
Publication types
Relative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Exploration Support,Non-U.S. Gov’t
MeSH terms
Adult
Dental Bias, Home Care *
. Dental Plaque/ pathology
Dental Plaque/ remedy *
Dental Plaque Index
Equipment Design
Erythrosine
Female
Fluorescent Colorings
Humans
Manly
Middle Progressed
Single-Eyeless System
Time Factors
Tooth/ pathology
Toothbrushing/ instrumentation
Toothbrushing/ styles
Toothpastes/ remedial use
Substances
Fluorescent Colorings
Toothpastes
Erythrosine
Buy on Amazon
